![]() We answer this question in the affirmative. ¶ 1 The dispositive issue in this taxpayers' qui tam 1 action is whether summary judgment was correctly given to defendants. Clyde Kirk, Assistant Attorneys General, Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendants/Appellees. Pipkin, Moore, OK, for Plaintiffs/Appellants. Department of Defense, Department of The Army and its Corps of Engineers, Defendants/Appellees. ![]() Thomasson, as individuals and as members of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board and the Water Conservation Storage Commission and The United States of America ex rel. Ross Kirtley, Richard McDonald, Dick Seybolt, Lonnie Farmer, Grady Grandstaff, Ervin Mitchell, Bill Secrest, Richard Sevenoaks, and Wendell E. ![]() Water Conservation Storage Commission and J. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD State of Oklahoma ex rel. Fent, as State of Oklahoma resident taxpayers, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |